Built for Asian founders
pitching Western investors.
Your business is strong. But Western investors evaluate decks through a specific lens — one that doesn’t always map to how Asian founders are taught to present. PitchVault scores your deck against the exact criteria US and European VCs use. Upload in any language. Get the honest read in under 2 minutes.
No account required · Works in Mandarin, Japanese, Korean, Arabic, and more · Results in under 2 minutes
“The business isn’t the problem.
The way it’s communicated to a Western investor is.”
It’s not the business. It’s the translation.
Western investors evaluate decks through a very specific framework — one that rewards certain structural choices, narrative patterns, and data formats. PitchVault scores your deck against that framework directly, so you know exactly what reads as strong and what reads as a gap.
Western VCs expect a problem-first narrative that escalates quickly to why now and why you. Many Asian decks lead with company history or product detail — both signal formats that lose investor attention in the first 60 seconds.
TAM/SAM/SOM is a Western convention with a specific logic. A number without a defensible methodology reads as guessed. PitchVault flags when market sizing is asserted rather than constructed.
What counts as traction differs by market. Western investors weight recurring revenue, NRR, and CAC:LTV — not GMV or registered users alone. The rubric evaluates traction against what investors at your stage actually convert on.
Institutional affiliation and academic credentials carry weight differently in Asian vs. Western fundraising contexts. Founder–market fit and relevant operator experience often matter more to US VCs than academic pedigree.
Upload. Score. Fix.
Three steps. Under 2 minutes. No account required for your first analysis.
Upload your deck in any language.
PDF or PowerPoint. Mandarin, Japanese, Korean, Arabic, English — it reads the content regardless of language. Select your funding stage. Results in under 2 minutes.
Scored against Western VC criteria.
The rubric evaluates your deck the same way a US investor does — thesis credibility, market sizing rigour, traction signal, team fit, ask logic. Not encouragement. The honest read.
See exactly what to fix.
Every gap is named and ranked. Section-by-section feedback tells you which slides are working, which are losing investors, and what to change before your next outreach.
Upload in any language.
Get feedback calibrated to Western VCs.
PitchVault reads your deck regardless of the language it’s written in. The scoring rubric is fixed — Western VC criteria, calibrated to your funding stage — so the feedback tells you exactly where the gap is between how you present and how investors evaluate.
Four scores across five investor lenses.
VaultScore™ tells you how your pitch reads. On Pro, VaultMoat™, VaultRisk™, and VaultOps™ are all available immediately — no score gate. Clear all four lens thresholds and your profile enters the investor network. Every gap is named and ranked.
Overall pitch quality scored against Western VC expectations at your stage.
Whether your competitive position is defensible — and whether you explained it the way investors evaluate it.
Downside exposure across 12 dimensions. Surfaces risks investors will probe in due diligence.
Operational execution readiness — can your team deliver on what the deck is promising?
Free plan includes VaultScore™ and slide-by-slide feedback. Pro unlocks all four scores (five-stage report).
“Really great report and feedback. The AI analysis is genuinely impressive — this is the kind of signal I actually act on.”
Sourcing from Asia?
Asian founders who use PitchVault and opt in become discoverable to approved investors. If you have a Japan, China, or broader Asia mandate — or if you’re seeing more Asian deal flow and want pre-screened signal before opening every deck — apply for investor access. It’s free and application-only.
Cost comparison · 2025–2026
What founders spend to prepare a fundable deck
PitchVault Full Report vs the alternatives — on cost, features, and what investors actually need.
| Option | Typical cost | Investor-grade scoring | Stage-calibrated rubric | Risk + moat analysis | Slide-by-slide feedback | Investor network access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitch coach1-on-1 sessions | $1,500–5,000+$150–500/hr · 5–10 sessions typical | |||||
| Freelance designerDesign only | $500–3,000$50–150/hr · fixed scope | |||||
| Deck agencyDesign + narrative | $5,000–25,000Mid-tier to premium | |||||
| AcceleratorYC / Techstars | 5–7% equity<2% acceptance rate | |||||
| Generic AI toolsChatGPT / other | $0–30/moNo investor rubric | |||||
| PitchVaultFull ReportBuilt on 3P Ventures rubric | $49Early access · list $79 |
Sources: Pitch coach rates — MentorCruise 2025, Qubit Capital 2026. Freelance designer — Upwork 2026. Agency — Whitepage Studio 2026. Accelerator equity — TechCrunch Apr 2025, YC S2025 terms. PitchVault pricing current as of April 2026.
Your deck scored against what Western investors actually look for.
Upload in any language. Get the honest read in under 2 minutes. No account required for your first analysis.
Works in Mandarin · Japanese · Korean · Arabic · English · and more
